Monday 26 January 2015

Information on Stephen Leacock's short story, The Conjurer's Revenge

Author of the Story

Stephen Leacock

Exposition of the Story

The Conjurer is trying to perform, and the Quick Man is debunking his entire act by revealing the methods of his tricks.

Rising Action of the Story

Tired of the Quick Man ruining his performance and causing restlessness amongst his audience, the Conjurer dupes the Quick Man into letting him destroy all of his stuff.

Climax of the Story

The Conjurer announces the performance is over if he can't destroy any more of the Quick Man's things.

Falling Action of the Story

The audience departs to music.

Resolution of the Story

"There are some tricks that are not done up the conjurer's sleeve."

Summary of 'THE CONJURER’S REVENGE'



                               THE CONJURER’S REVENGE by Stephen Leacock
The conjurer called the attention of the people and showed an empty cloth. He said, ‘Presto!’ He took out a bowl of goldfish. All around the hall people wondered that how he did it. But the Quick Man on the front seat said in a big whisper to the people that he had it up his sleeve. Then everybody whispered round the hall that he had it up his sleeve. Then everybody whispered round the hall that he had it up his sleeve. The conjurer said that his next trick was the famous Hindostanee rings. He showed that the rings were separate. At a blow they all joined. The Quick Man whispered that he had another lot up his sleeve. Again everybody nodded and whispered that the rings were up his sleeve.
The conjurer worried a lot but he continued his tricks. The conjurer got a hat from the audience and he extracted seventeen eggs in thirty five seconds. The audience began to think that he was wonderful. Then the Quick Man whispered along the front bench that he had a hen up his sleeve and so all the people whispered it on that he had a lot of hens up his sleeve. The egg trick was ruined. It went on like that all through. Whatever the tricks he did, he got the same response. It seemed that the conjurer must have concealed his sleeve. The reputation of the conjurer was rapidly sinking below zero.
He rallied for a final effort. He said that he would present to them the famous Japanese trick recently invented by the natives of Tipperary. He turned toward the Quick Man and requested him to give his gold watch. It was passed to him. The conjurer asked the Quick Man if he had his permission to put it into that mortar and pound it to pieces. The Quick Man nodded and smiled. The conjurer threw the watch into the mortar and grasped a sledge hammer from the table and smashed it. The Quick Man whispered that he had slipped it up his sleeve. The conjurer asked him whether he would allow him to take his handkerchief and punch holes in it. He made visible holes in it. The real mystery of the thing fascinated the Quick Man.
Then the conjurer asked for the Quick Man’s permission to dance on his silk hat. The conjurer passed on the hat with his feet and crushed his it. Then he got his celluloid collar and burnt it with his permission. Then he got his spectacles and smashed it with hammer. The Quick Man puzzled and he whispered that he didn’t see through it a bit. The conjurer concluded that he had broken his watch, burnt his collar, smashed his spectacles and danced on his hat with his permission. The audience dispersed with a acceptance that there were some tricks that were not done up the conjurer’s sleeve.   

A Retrieved Reformation O. Henry

A Retrieved Reformation O. Henry               
Synopsis
Set in the American Midwest during the early 1900s, “A Retrieved Reformation” concerns the surprising fate of Jimmy Valentine, a skilled young safecracker who returns to society after he is paroled from prison. The story begins at the prison shortly before Jimmy Valentine if set free; the majority of the narrative occurs in Elmore, a small backwoods town in Arkansas where he settles. Major characters include Jimmy Valentine; Mike Dolan, his partner in crime; detective Ben Price, Jimmy’s nemesis; and Annabel Adams, the girl with whom Jimmy falls in love. Minor characters are the prison warden; Cronin, a prison guard; Mr. Adams, Annabel’s father; Annabel’s sister; Annabel’s two young nieces, May and Agatha; a hotel clerk; and a young boy who lives in Elmore.
As the story begins, Jimmy is called to the warden’s office. The warden hands Jimmy his pardon from the governor and advises him to stay out of trouble: “You’re not a bad fellow at heart,” he says. “Stop cracking safes, and live straight.” Jimmy laughs, feigning surprise, denying he had ever cracked a safe or committed the bank robbery that had sent him to prison.
Jimmy leaves prison the next day and takes a train to another town where he meets up with Mike Dolan, a friend and confederate. After picking up his key from Mike, Jimmy returns to his room above Mike’s restaurant where he had lived before detective Ben Price arrested him. Jimmy finds his safe cracking tools still hidden in the wall where he had left them. A week later, a string of bank safe burglaries in the Midwest comes to Ben Price’s attention; he knows Jimmy Valentine is back in business and sets out to catch him again.
Meanwhile, carrying his burglar tools in a suitcase, Jimmy arrives in small, remote Elmore, Arkansas, where he plans to rob the bank. Walking toward the hotel, he encounters a beautiful young woman. Their eyes meet, and in that instant, Jimmy undergoes a complete reformation: “Jimmy Valentine looked into her eyes, forgot what he was, and became another man.” After talking to a boy on the street, Jimmy learns she is Annabel Adams, whose father owns the bank. Jimmy continues on to the hotel, where he registers as “Ralph D. Spencer.” In a conversation with the hotel clerk, Jimmy learns that Elmore does not have a shoe store and that business is good in the town. Jimmy Valentine does not rob the bank; instead, “Ralph Spencer” settles in Elmore, opens a profitable shoe store, becomes a social success, and makes the acquaintance of Annabel Adams.
A year elapses. Still using his “Ralph Spencer” alias, Jimmy enjoys great success. His business is growing, he and Annabel are soon to be married, and Annabel’s father and sister have accepted him as one of the family. To cut completely the ties with his past, Jimmy writes a letter to one of his former friends, asking the man to meet him in Little Rock. Jimmy plans to give the man his set of safe cracking tools. The day before Jimmy is to leave for Little Rock, Ben Price arrives in Elmore, spots Jimmy Valentine, and learns he is about to marry the banker’s daughter. Ben Price has other ideas.
The next day before leaving town, with his burglar tools in his suitcase, Jimmy goes to the bank with Annabel, Annabel’s sister, and the sister’s two little girls, May and Agatha. Annabel’s father wants to show off the new burglar-proof safe he has recently installed. While all are admiring the safe, Ben Price comes into the bank and watches the scene; he tells a bank teller “he was just waiting for a man he knew.” Jimmy is unaware of the detective’s presence.
Without warning, May playfully locks Agatha in the bank vault, throwing the bolts and spinning the combination lock as she had seen her grandfather perform the maneuver. The safe cannot be opened, Mr. Adams exclaims in horror, since the timer and the combination had not been set. Furthermore, Agatha will soon run out of air in the vault. Jimmy and the others can hear Agatha crying out in panic. Annabel turns to Jimmy, begging him to do something, at least to try.
Jimmy looks at Annabel with a “soft smile.” He asks her for the rose she is wearing. Confused, Annabel hands him the rose. Jimmy puts the rose in his vest pocket, throws off his coat, and pushes up his shirtsleeves: “With that act Ralph D. Spencer passed away and Jimmy Valentine took his place.” Using his tools, Jimmy opens the safe in record time, freeing the sobbing child.
Once Agatha is safe, Jimmy puts on his coat and walks away; he hears Annabel call out to him, but he does not stop. When he encounters Ben Price, who has witnessed the dramatic scene, Jimmy tells the detective, “Well, let’s go. I don’t know that it makes much difference, now.” Price, who seems to be acting rather oddly, replies, “Guess you’re mistaken, Mr. Spencer . . . Don’t believe I recognize you.” With that, the detective leaves.
“A Retrieved Reformation” was published in 1909 in O. Henry’s book of short stories, Roads of Destiny. It features several of the narrative elements for which O. Henry’s short stories are well known. The surprise ending is especially characteristic of O. Henry’s tales, as are the story’s numerous gentle ironies. Jimmy Valentine leaves prison with no thought of leading a conventional, respectable life, and he comes to Elmore to rob the bank. Instead, he falls in love with the banker’s daughter, finds a new family, runs a flourishing shoe store (having learned to make shoes in prison), and becomes a pillar in his new community. Furthermore, the special skills he had used in his criminal pursuits enable him to save a little girl’s life. His unlikely reformation is “retrieved” by the detective most determined to arrest him.
The tone of the story, with its gentle humor and sentimentality, is representative of much of O. Henry’s work. Although Jimmy Valentine has no intention of abandoning his life of crime, love magically transforms him in an instant. Also, many of O. Henry’s stories develop themes which, in their simplicity, can be summed up as “the moral of the story.” In the case of Jimmy Valentine, goodness is rewarded. Cracking Mr. Adams’ safe does not send him back to prison; it prevents his being arrested—the final irony and one that satisfies because, as the warden observes, Jimmy is “not a bad fellow at heart.”


Summary of Anita Desai’S, “a Devoted Son”

Summary of Anita Desai’S, “a Devoted Son”
Anita Desai’s story is all about duty and devotion. It draws a picture of the life of a son. The son is brought up by his father, starts earning his livelihood and then, dutifully looks after his father. However, crisis develops as his father, whimsical due to age, starts misinterpreting his son’s treatment. The question that the story posse is that how long should a son take care of his father? What should be the extent of his dutifulness and obedience? This is a problem of the modern world caused by the busy life. It becomes difficult to attend to the whims of the elderly people after a days’ hard work. But should the duty and the toleration end? Or should a person remain ever dutiful? Should sacrifices be made on our part or should we continue to be self-centered and move and move our own way. The world has both instances of both but which is more acceptable?
            Rakesh was a son born to illiterate parents. He was the first to receive education in his generation and how well he utilized it. Villagers felt proud as Rakesh stood first though the jealousy factor didn’t cease to exist. His education took him to the United States of America but to everyone’s surprise, he returned to his country to marry an Indian removing all doubts to marry a foreigner. His devotion towards his parents was proud when he married an uneducated girl of their choice. The girl too was good natured and they were soon blessed with a son. Rakesh’s rise continued and he soon went to the top of the administrative organization, bought a car and thus it was the beginning of his fortune. However, he did not forget his parents and he did take them out in his brand new car. Rakesh was not only devoted but was also good natured. He obeyed his parents, humored his wife, hosted his friends, and in addition, was an excellent doctor. However, Rakesh’s joyride was short-lived. His mother passed away which also ensured his father’s breakdown. Old age caught up with his father and it was difficult to distinguish between his peevish whims and matters of significance. A birthday party for the youngest son had to be broken up at once, when they discovered that the old man was on the verge of death. The old man, however continued to live much longer thereafter.
            Rakesh however, accepted his fate and its’ twist. He brought his father’s morning tea, read the newspapers and visited his father after returning from the clinic. All these couldn’t make the father happy and the situation worsened when Rakesh as a father began to supervise his diet. The supervision which included the cutting down on oily, fried stuff, sweets and beetle nut was seen as a sort of disrespect and mal-treatment by his father. The matter was so serious that the old man even went to the extent of complaining to his neighbors. Rakesh couldn’t help but be sterner. He as a doctor believed that strictness was better where his father’s health was concerned. The old man even tried to bribe his grand children which were met with strong reproach from Rakesh.

            The father-son relationship began to go haywire. The old man began to hate his son and his daughter-in-law. The wife of Rakesh stayed out of trouble tactfully and Rakesh, able to feel every pulse, neglected nothing about his father. He made constant and repeated attempts to make improvement in his father’s mental and physical health. His efforts went in vain. This is the poignant question that we face to continue or discontinue service of a son to his father.
            This is a matter of both culture and tradition. Old age is also called the second childhood. We are always tender to a child in spite of his naughtiness and undue demands. Similarly, we should treat elderly people the same way. We don’t discard children because they disturb us. In case of old people, we become biased, as we have seen them wise and matured before our own eyes. The grey cells become disfuntioning in old age and so elderly people behave in a childish way. Life is hard and difficult and all of us have our own share of problems. However, the rise above limitation will only make us better human beings. Patience and sacrifice shaped our hallmark. We should understand our own maturity and wisdom are not lost and this would help us to be kinder to them. Old age is cyclic and all of us would step into its shoes one day. The remembrance of this fact can wake us up to the reality of this life. Rakesh, in spite of everything else understood this, which made him stand apart and above from the rest.


Engine Trouble by R.K Narayan

Engine Trouble by R.K Narayan
Brief Analysis
This is a story by Narayan which begins on an ironic note of how a prize won by a man proves to be an expensive headache.
A showman comes to Malgudi and brings with him his Gaiety land. The Gymkhana grounds are used for the festivities and the whole town pours in to see the show. Our protagonist wins a road engine at a show, people gather around him looking at him as if he is some curious animal. Now the problem that rises is how to take the prize back home. The driver of the engine is an expensive one and the suggestion of bringing in the municipality is not a good idea. Its decided that the engine can stay on the Gymkhana grounds till the end of the season but the cost of maintaining it on those grounds prove to be expensive for our protagonist.
A cattle show comes to town and he is given 24 hours’ time to remove it, so a temple elephant and 50 coolies are hired to take it to a nearby field owned by a friend. Joseph, a dismissed bus driver comes in to help steer the engine. Hell breaks loose resulting in undue expenditures.
Narayan introduces a Swamiji who performs various impossible feats and insists on having a road engine run over his chest. The municipality does not know how to arrange for one. Our protagonist becomes the hero of the hour by lending his engine for the feat. And in return it would be driven wherever he wanted it to. It is Narayan’s ability to bring forth the comic elements present in the most grave situations which is commendable the figure of Swamiji who wants to spread his master’s word through his feat is brought under the light of humour to show how such things are still rampant in our country and how people’s psyche is taken advantage of by such people.
Unfortunately in the story, the law comes in between and the feat cannot be performed, through the figure of a police inspector, the legality of doing such acts has been brought forward by Narayan where the inspector says that Swamiji  can do anything except have potassium cyanide or have a rail engine run over him.
It is a natural calamity that comes as a stroke of luck for our protagonist and solves all his problems. Again Narayan shows the irony of how a calamity that claimed several towns bears good tidings for the owner of the engine. Read this story to find out how that calamity proves fortunate for the protagonist. An interesting comparison can be drawn with another story Lawley Road where the protagonist comes to own a British general’s  statue and the troubles he has to go through to move the statue.In both the stories one sees Narayan commentary on the plight of his heros is comic nor when his heros sink to depair.It is  probably  Narayan’s  answer to how to go about with your life when you live in India.
Narayan has a love for describing carnivals, fairs, and the expo. Story after story we find in hisMalgudi Days being set in such an environment if not then we at least have a market scene.Engine Trouble starts at a fair with the protagonist winning an engine, Emden goes through the hustle and bustle of a market place for his evening walk. An Astrologer’s Day is set in a bazaar and so is the Trail of the Green Blazer which is set in a bazaar. It seems Narayan situated most of the Malgudi stories on Malgudi’s public landmarks


AMBAI'S SQUIRREL SUMMARY

Ambai’s (b.1944)”Squirrel” falls under the category of “non-conformists” when speaking of women writing in Modern Indian Literature. Ambai’s “Squirrel” (translated from Tamil by Lakshmi) rebels in their own way against the existing system. Ambai voices strongly about Feminism, through a completely different style of narrative. Women, who refuse to accept the prevalent codes, question the injustice, assert their individuality, and demand the right to seek fulfillment, are grouped under the title of “Non-Conformists. And hence, Ambai falls into “non conformists”.
A study of the women characters in this story establishes the point that the writer has shown admirable psychological insight while creating her women character. The novelistic concern is to probe, analyze and develop deeper into the secret recesses of her as women and present her in flesh and blood. She has been successfully able to strike a sympathetic cord with their women characters and with their psychological reactions and responses, broodings and frustrations.
Ambai’s “Squirrel”, the rebellion is more in narration and content than in plot. A writer will have his own vision which may be peculiar and unique. Her perspective changes according to her experiences of the world in which she lives. A writer is apt to be more sensitive to the disturbing day-to-day happenings and changes around him/her, and tends to react and respond intensely. The works, more often than not, contain and reflect the experience and vision of their creator. As Joseph Conrad puts it, “in truth every novelist must begin by creating for himself a world great or little in which he can honestly believe. This world cannot be made otherwise than in his own image”. This is exactly what happens in Ambai’s “Squirrel”.
The protagonist, in the story, is a feminist sympathizer. The story is based on her one expedition to a library, which is full of feminist writing. And how she feels and perceives it. The terrible condition of the books, and one final declaration at the end, that because of not being able to maintain them, they would be burnt. The books here, as much a character themselves as is the protagonist. There’s a squirrel, which serves as a bridge between the “transcendental and the real”, or rather the “dream and real” for the protagonist. The character of the squirrel is highly suggestive. The squirrel stands for the inner world of the narrator. The transition between dream and reality and vice versa is made through the symbolism of the squirrel.
 “Squirrel” though is rebellious as a whole. The basic theme is a “sympathizer of the victim”. There is a strong feminist voice in the latter, whereas the former lacks it. The latter consciously reflects the brutal condition of feminine writing while the former, unconsciously rebels against the repression in act. The part, the squirrel plays in “Squirrel” characters are catalytically in nature. But simultaneously, “Squirrel” voices about feminism and male suppression. And here too, the story doesn’t end here. The story begins from and continues to its author, Ambai, the strong feminist voice of dissidence, as Venkat Swaminathan puts in “The Written Wrath of the Dispossessed” (Many Indias, Many Literature) - “A firm assertion of the individual dignity of a female does not have to end up in sacrifice of feminine graces. Should it? In Ambai, the artist, it hasn’t”.
Ambai’s “Squirrel” is the style of narration which makes the books and authors in the “Squirrel” are the lively, fleshy characters themselves. “Squirrel” is hardly over until one analyzes the narrative style.
“A story conveys what the author perceives and comprehends of the world around. In other words, a story represents the writer’s vision of life as it faces him. Though the story gets its sustenance from the story it intends to tell, its success depends on how it is narrated and also what else it conveys.  The caliber of the story is judged as much by  what it conveys as by how it is conveyed. And as she continues- “At the same time, it need not be a vehicle to carry on the propaganda or criticism of dogmas and ideologies. It should be a living thing that has, what E.M. Forster calls, “the intense stiflingly human quality”.”

Hence in this story, we can see the importance and significance of the narrative style. It’s the narration “Squirrel” that transcendental place between dream and reality, enlivens up each book and author into a character of its own, and also heightens the sensation.

In conclusion, summing up that the “women voice” has secured a place of its own, and this had been achieved through their characters. When England was in the throes of feminist movement, English feminists expressed their resentment at the treatment meted out to women. Mary Wollstonecraft, a feminist, declares in her spirited work “A vindication of the Rights of Woman”, “I here throw my gauntlet, and deny the existence of sexual virtues not excepting modesty. For men and women, truth, if I understand the meaning of the word must be the same … women, I allow, may have differed duties, but the principles that regulate the discharge of them, I sturdily maintain, must be the same.” This strong wave of sexual consciousness thrashed the shores of Indian Women Writing, and the outcome is one and many Ambais and Chughtais. Sitaram Jayaswal says- “The role of the writer is to feel the pulse of the society, know its sickness and suggest such cures as are in consonance with his culture.” This is exactly what has been done by Ambai. And, lastly, as again story reveals the variegated facets of women in modern India and as such reflect the fully awakened feminine sensibility.And this exactly has been made possible though the character Ambai’s “Squirrel”.