Abstract
On the surface, there is nothing particularly complicated
about Strindberg's mono dramatic situational plot one – Act play structure,
“The Stronger ". Two women- Tow actresses – run into each other in a
restaurant on Christmas Eve. One is married and has been out shopping for
presents for her family, the other is unmarried and is sitting alone in the
restaurant reading magazines and drinking. We are told almost nothing about these
two women- they are not even important enough to have names; Strindberg calls them simply Mrs. X. and
Miss. Y. And, the entire play consists of nothing more than a single
conversation between these two women. There is no action, no real plot development,
nothing particularly out of the ordinary. In fact , one of the woman – Miss. Y.
does not even speak in the entire play ,i.e. Miss Y. maintaining her share in
the development of the action by pantomime , facial expressions , and an
occasional laugh ,
Introduction
The Stronger is
universally considered the quintessential short play and a superb monodrama of
great psychological profundity. The play represents a triangular situation in
which two actresses—one married, Mrs. X, and one unmarried, Miss Y—meet
accidentally at a café while Christmas shopping and begin considering their
past rivalry in love for Mrs. X’s husband. The play is unique in that the
subject of the discussion, the husband, never appears, and for the fact that
only one of the women, Mrs. X, speaks, while the other, Miss Y, merely reacts.
To say “merely” is, however, to minimize unjustly the silent role, for it
presents challenges every bit as great as those offered to the silent Mrs. X.
In The Stronger Strindberg demonstrates what a keen insight and capacity for
observation he possessed in regard to human nature and its machinations. There is,
of course, the fairly open question of which of the two women is the stronger,
the married actress who takes all in stride, bends with the winds, and survives
in the dog-eat-dog world, or the taciturn Miss Y who, as Mrs. X says, has
failed to bend and broken like a dry reed. But is her observation correct or is
it wishful thinking? ; For near the end she observes that
Miss Y, rather than going after her prey aggressively,
merely sits like a cat at the rat hole and outwaits it. Mrs. X may in fact be
announcing her own eventual loss of her husband to Miss Y—except that she is currently
so secure in her marriage and family that she is unaware of her unconscious
premonition. Like all great works, The Stronger has built-in ambiguities.
One –Act Play
The form of the One –
Act Play could be distinguished from the full –length play by the restriction
of its basic dramatic elements: characters, plot structure, language and dialogue.
It tends to reveal character through a brisk sequence of events whereas the
normal play tends to show character developing as a result of actions and under
the impact of incidents in every detail. Accordingly, the plot and the language
of one –act plays are reduced to an absolute minimum. The dramatic conflict is
minimized to the extent that it is presented in one, or sometimes tow,
situation throughout the play. The motivation of the characters is often
uncomplicated since the one-act play lacks the extension of time, place and
action through which the normal character in the full length- play is developed.
Because of the restriction of the previous dramatic techniques, the language of
the one-act play becomes highly suggestive. There is no room for any irrelevant
statement. Every sentence basically and directly contributes to the main action.
In short, the relation of the one- act play to the normal or the longer drama
has often been linked to that of the short story to the novel. One of the
important dramatists, who is contributed to the new wave of the one –act play,
is August Strindberg. In his one simple situation, The Stronger, Strindberg
creates an episode of incredible, poetic power – a snapshot of life so intense,
so powerful, that it rivals Beckett at his best. The Stronger is full and rich in
allegory and lends itself to many layers of interpretation; it is a play that
takes little more than ten minutes to read / perform, but that one can easily
spend hours thinking about afterwards. It is moreover, a powerful play, one
that makes a deep impression, and leaves one with the illusion that one has
traveled far and. Seen much, even though
the entire thing is actually incredibly short
No comments:
Post a Comment