Monday, 27 October 2014

Who is the Stronger in the Play of August Strindberg

The Swedish writer August Strindberg (1849-1912) is generally recognized as the first expressionist playwright.  August Strindberg was born on 22 January 1849 at Riddar-Holms-hammen 14 He ancestors came from Angermanland Province in northern Sweden.  The first twenty years of Strindberg's life was a period of great economic and industrial growth for Stockholm.  During high school, he led a classroom rebellion against school religion.  He refused to attend school prayers.  After graduation from high school, he joined two universities and he became a member of the privileged class.


He married three times.  His first wife was the Swedish actress Sirivon Essen (married in 1887, divorced in 1880s), his second wife was the Austrian author Fridauli (married in 1893; divorced in 1896), his third wife was the Swedish actress, Harriet Boss (married in 1901, divorced in 1904).  He wrote plays and letters but he couldn't write verse.  He started to write a comedy set in Rome earlier in the nineteenth century, and a tragedy about Christ.  (Lindberg, 2000: P.50)


Strindberg himself, writing to his wife, Siri, who was to play Mrs X in the opening performance, instructed her to play Mrs X as the "Stronger, that is to say, the softer".  For, he continued, "the rigid person breaks while the supple person bends, and rises again."


Strindberg is a Swedish playwright, novelist and short-story writer, who embodied in his works psychology, naturalism, and other element of new literary forms.  Strindberg was married three times - several of his plays draw on the problems of his marriages and reflected his constant interest in self-analysis.   Sensitive and controversial writer; who suffered from hostile reviews.  Strindberg represented the 18th century ideal of artist as a free personality, unrestricted by convention.  (Carlson, 1993: P. 40)


"My souls (characters) are conglomerations

of the past and present stages of

civilization, bits from books and

newspaper scraps of humity, rags

and tatters of fine clothing, patched

together as is the human soul

and I have added alittle

evolutionary history by making the

weaker steal and repeat the

words of the Stronger, and by

making the characters borrow

the ideas "suggestions" from one another."(1)

(Authors forward to Miss Julie in Six Plays of Strindberg, 1995: P.20)


He is a painter, essayist, and photographer.  He explored a wide range of dramatic methods and purposes from naturalistic tragedy, monodrama, and history surrealist dramatic techniques.  He is considered the "father of Modern Swedish Literature" (Adam, 2002: P. 15).  His view on psychological power struggles may be seen in works such as "The Stronger" (1889).  It is his notable contribution.

 

Who is the Stronger, Mrs X or Miss Y?

 

Eric (1958: P. 918), mentions things about the characters and said that there are two women, ran into each other in a restaurant on Christmas Eve.  One is married and has been at shopping for presents for her family, the other is unmarried and is sitting alone in the restaurant reading magazine and drinking.  Those two women are not even important enough to have names; Strindberg calls them simply: Mrs X and Miss Y.


"The comer of aladies' café.  Two little iron

tables, a red velvet sofa, several chairs.

Enter Mrs X, dressed in winter clothes,

carrying a Japanese basket on her arm.

Miss Y sits with a half-empty beer

bottle before her, reading an illustrated

paper, which she changes later for another."(2)


Here, the entire play consists on nothing more than a single conversation between these two women.  There is no action, no real plot development, nothing particularly out of the ordinary.  In fact, one of the women, Miss Y, doesn't even speak in the entire performance.


"Mrs X Do you know it really hurts

me to see you like this, alone in a café's,

and on Christmas Eve, too.  It makes me

feel as I did one time when I saw abridal

party in a Paris restaurant, and the

bride sat reading a comic paper, while

the groom played billiards with the witnesses."(3)

Pishkan (2000: P.915), mentions that Miss Y seems the stronger: "Well, they are not altogether the same thing, looks up scornfully.  Now you shall see what I bought for my piggy wigs up a doll.  Miss Y laughs aloud, shrinks with laughter.  I won't sit at the same table with you."  (Ibid: P. 915).  These are such considerable evidence that show the capable person who can stay worthless in the face of an uncontrolled spate of words is both strong and wise.  A babbler, especially a female babbler, is supposed inevitably to wind herself into a cocoon on her own words and become entrapped. We need only reflect that Mrs X, however unwittingly, has remade herself in limitation of rival to become convinced that Miss Y, the rival, somehow evictions, even though she had lost both her fiancé and the man who formed the apex of the love triangle.  Miss Y's position as the true victor - the stronger - seems even more convincing.  Mrs X embroidered tulips, which she hates, but it is Miss Y's favourite flowers.  Mrs X tries to imitate Miss Y's father name.  Mrs X tries to wear Miss Y's colours, reads her favourite authors, eats her favourite foods, and drinks her favourite drinks as it is shown in the following lines:


"That is the reason I had to embroider tulips

which I hate on his slippers, because you

are fond of tulips; we go to Lake Malarn in

the summer, because you don't like salt

water; that's why my boy is named Eskil-

because it is your father's name; that is why

I wear your colours, read your authors, eat your

favourite dishes, drink your drink, chocolate..."(4)


There are many women who resemble Mrs X and her sudden flash of insight, and this shows how powerful Miss Y's influence has been on her and her life, wants to acknowledge the superior strength of her adversary.  Indeed, for a few moments Mrs X seems to be making such acknowledgement.  She begins to compare Miss Y with different things.  She compares her to a worm eating an apple (Mrs X) from the inside and leaving nothing; but Mrs X means that she lives inside her all the time so the soul is that of Miss Y; but the body is that of Mrs X because she imitates her as part of her plan.


Besides, she compares her to a snake because Miss Y cheats by seducing her husband and she had watched her with black eyes.  This means that Mrs X can not get ride of the influence of Miss Y; therefore, Mrs X regards herself as a bird caught by that snake.  Also, she (Miss Y) compares her to a giant crab lying under water catching the bound feet of Mrs X by its powerful claws.  The following lines show the weaknesses of Mrs X, they are:


"Your soul crept into mine, like a worm

into an apple, ate and ate, bored and

bored, until nothing was left but the

wind and a little block dust within I

wanted to get from Xou, but I could

not I left that when I littled my wings

they only dragged me down; I lay in

the water with bound feet and the

stronger I strove to keep up the deeper I

worked myself down, down, until I sank

to the botton, when you lay like a giant

crab to clutch me in your claws -and

there I am lying now."(5)


Strindberg creates an episode of incredible, poetic power - a snapshot of life so intense, so powerful that it rivals Beckett at his best.  The Stronger is rich in allegory and lends itself to many layers of interpretation; it is a play that takes little more the ten minutes to read / perform, but that can easily spend hours thinking about afterwards.  It is, moreover, a powerful play, one that makes a deep impression, and leaves one with the illusion that has travelled for and seen much, even though the entire thing is actually incredible short.  (John, 1985: P. 10)


What is it that makes the play so powerful?  To begin with, it is an immaculate piece of stagecraft.  It is a tribute to Strindberg's genius that despite the father that Miss Y says nothing right though the play, the interaction between her and Mrs X is inevitable sense of the term dialogue.  Strindberg uses a combination of stage directions and reactions from Mrs X to ensure that Miss Y is more than a passive listener and that her responses influence and guide the thread of the scene.


Kia (2001, P.22), states that the purpose of Mrs X in using different thins in the play is her desire to degrade Miss Y.  But there is a more serious reason that, it is that the man is originally an animal.  Therefore, Mrs X uses different images of animals to explain the behaviours of Miss Y: "I hate you, hate you, hate you!"  she cries after a passionate speech, her recognition of the true meaning of past circumstance Mrs X's character is changed and grown before an eyes.  Her angry outburst is followed by scornful vituperation: "you only sit there ... as quiet as a stroke by a rat hole ... and read the papers ... to see if someone has not been given notice at the theatre."


This gives place to pity: "you are unhappy, unhappy like one who has been wounded."  And pity gives place to triumph.  You are angry because you are wounded, I can't be angry with you; no matter how much I want to be because you come out the weaker one.  (Ibid: P. 30)


In fact, "The Stronger" is one of those fascinate pieces of writing that lend themselves to multiple and conflicting interpretations.  As the play progresses, we discover that Miss Y and Mrs X are rivals for more than theatre roles - Miss Y is having / has had an affair with Mrs X's husband.  Except that the play never really corroborates this - we only know that by the end of the scene Mrs X believes that this is true.  (The Element of Drama, P. 22)


Frequently, Mrs X learned to drink chocolate from you.  But, Miss Y is now sipping (drinking) beer, forget her awful life and run away from her better reality.  This refers to Mrs X changes towards the best; while Miss Y lost.  Mrs X to Miss Y that she is stronger than her due to Miss Y learned Mrs X how to love her husband and these are the means by which Miss X was watching Miss Y all the time and was taking useful thing of her.  Mrs X thanks Miss Y for her good lessons.  The following lines show Mrs X's strength:


"Everything is worthless and sterile in your

hands; you can never keep a man's

love with your tulips and your passions.

But I can keep it.  You can't learn how

to live, as I have learned.  You have no

little Eskil.  You are always silent?

I thought that was strength, but perhaps

It is because you have nothing to say!

Thank you, Amelia, for all your good

lessons.  Thanks for teaching my husband

how to love.  Now I am going home to

love him."(6)


The debate in the play is about gender roles.  The divergence of interpretations brings us to the first of the allegories implicit in the play.  Strindberg captures wrongfully the fundamental duality of the role women play in society.  In Mrs X, we have the woman as caring mother and devoted wife, a person who has lost all individuality and been completely reshaped by the demands of her husband a woman who glories in the stability and warmth of the family life she had achieved on the other hand, we have Miss Y, who is the independent woman, who lives her life her own way and is able, because of her independence to shape others to her personality, but who ultimately ends up alone in a restaurant on Christmas Eve.  (Julia, 1975: P.22)


Edwin (1979, P.5), illustrates that there is a deeper allegory in the play in choosing to silence the character of Miss Y and showing us how Mrs X is able to carry on a conversation with someone who never actually speaks to her at all, Strindberg has created an image of man's interaction with God.  In the play, Miss Y is not really an individual, but more a sort of human mirror that Mrs X uses to understand and interpret her own life, surfacing her discontent and insecurity and reconciling herself to them by means of dialogue that is entirely one sided Miss Y doesn't need to say anything, and what she thinks or knows has no part in the development of the story.

 

The Theme of the Play "The Stronger"


Pishkan (2000, P. 612), states that expressionism is generally applied to 20th century view point that proclaims the primacy of emotion in all the arts.  Expressionism signifies all modern art, it is actually a recurring tender linked to romanticism.  It is traced back to developments in France during the 1880s in reaction against impressionism.  Expressionism, in literature, as, art was an attempt to widen the frontier of aesthetic consciousness by exploring aspects of mind unaccounted for by realism or naturalism.


The term "expressionism" was first used to describe the world painters who departed from the value and techniques of the impressionists; but soon extended to describe a variety of experimental techniques in all the arts.  Expressionist writers often distorted objects and actions from the outer world in order to represent them as they appeared in the inner mind.  The Swedish writer August Strindberg is generally recognized as the first expressionist playwright.  This theme seeks to give artistic shape to inner, often revolutionary tendencies; his belief was that the economic and social conditions of the age were constant driving women into an increasingly selfish and immoral position.  He was violent hatred of women in general.  The play "Stronger" is about many aspects of two ladies, Mrs X who is an actress, married and Miss Y an actress, unmarried.  We have seen Mrs X's anxiety about her husband, and Miss Y shows ignorance and careless which means that this form of dialogue without answering is one of the characteristics of the expressionism theatre.  Mrs X has an inner problem and Miss Y does bad deeds by attracting me; which is another characteristic of the expressionistic theatre to take revenge from society.  (Ibid: PP.222-224)


In fact, the theme is about women that economic and social conditions of the age were constant driving women into an increasingly selfish and immoral position.  Therefore, we can say Mrs X disgusts from Miss Y and the deeds of Miss Y can be the cause of poor conditions of their social life.  Strindberg Mrs X in the opening performance, instructed her to play Mrs X as the stronger; that is to say, the softer.  He stays the rigid person.


Conclusions

On the surface, there's nothing particularly complicated about Strindberg's play "The Stronger". Two women - two actresses - run into each other in a restaurant on Christmas Eve. One is married and has been out shopping for presents for her family, the other is unmarried and is sitting alone in the restaurant reading magazines and drinking. We are told almost nothing about these women - they are not even important enough to have names; Strindberg calls them simply Mrs. X and Miss Y. And the entire play consists of nothing more than a single conversation between these two women. There is no action, no real plot development, nothing particularly out of the ordinary. In fact, one of the women, Miss Y, doesn't even speak in the entire performance.



The play is filled with irony.  One reason  Mrs X is not thought to be the stronger is that she goes back to her husband after she concludes that and affair has existed ironically thinking that an affair will not disable her marriage, and she says: "That only gave me a stronger hold on my husband."

notes 

(1)             Ekman, Has Gorm, (2000).  Strindberg and the Five Scenes: Studies in Strindberg's Chamber Plays London and New Brunswick, New Jersey.  P. 54.
(2)             Falker, Fanny, (1921).  August Strindberg.  P.17.
(3)             Innes, Christopher, (2000).  A Source Book on Naturalist Theatre.  London New York.  P.11. 
(4)             Meyer, Michael, (1985).  Strindberg: A Biography.  Oxford.  P.77.
(5)             Paulson, Arvid, (1970).  World Historical Plays.  By August Strindberg.  New York.  P.60.
(6)   William, Paymond, (1952).  Drama from Ibsen to Bretch.  London. P.20.

References

Adam (2002).  Dictionary of Literary Biography.  Vol. 259.  Twentieth-Century
                     Swedish Writers before World Was II.
Carlson, M. (1993).  Theories of the Theatre: A Historical and Critical survey from
                   the Greeks to the Present.  London: Cornel University Press.
-------------- (1993).  All August Strindberg's Life.
Lane, S. (1998).  The Sons of a Servant.
Lindberg. (2000).  The Swedish Theatre.
Modernism:  Against the New Conformists.  London and New York.
Benttey, E. (1958).  The Brates.  United States of America.
Perrine, L. (2001).  Drama:  The Elements of Drama.  Ltd.
Peter, V. (2000).  Stylistic.  Oxford:  Oxford University Press.
Piskhan, K. (2000).  A Readers' Guide to English Literature.  Oxford.
Strindberg, A. (1985).  The Stronger.  New York.  Ltd.
Word, J. (1980).  The Social and Religious Plays of Strindberg. London

No comments:

Post a Comment